Tutorial � Hegel vs Kant

Greg Detre

@11 on Monday, 19 February, 2001

Dr Rosen, post-Kantian VI

 

you can defend Hegel as having no arguments against Kant, but having higher desiderata (something which is desired)

 

Kant assumes that the philosophical method stands outside the categories but there�s no such vantage point, except maybe to the physiologist � but this is not what Kant is concerned with

he�s worried about our knowledge of the world

 

what is form + what is content?

Kant � we can know the structure of our own mind, and how it conceptualises the world

but Hegel thinks this is implausible

surely, the spatio-temporal imposition itself happens as an act in time

what about a 4D spacetime continuum???

but this synthesis happens in the self according to Kant

moving to a world as constituted by Geist, not by individuals

can you rescue Kant? 2 ways:

1.       separate transcendental part from imagination transcendental psychology (Strawson)

transcendental psychology vs transcendental philosophy

2.       psychologist view � more like experimental psychologists

naturalise epistemology, utilise scientific knowledge

dualism between form + content

mind in 2 parts:

deals with stuff given to us � given manifold (intuitions)

works on it � rules for synthesis (concepts)

different from phenomena/nuomena

nuomena = source of phenomena

transcendental idealism is empirical realism

tables + chairs = appearances but also out there, but not wholly

ontologically independent (Ansich)

the tree exists in the quad without us, but it�s constructed in spacetime by our mind

so its existence is interpreted by us???

how do we get from bent stick in the water straight stick

judgement, i.e. a sort of processing procedure to get from given to in-itself

so there is a content you are given upon which you impose form, but never see form without content

that form = concepts, including the categories (pure concepts of the understanding)

categories = present in ALL judgements

space + time = pure form of intuition

 

Kant gets rid of mind-body dualism

there is only thinking substance, extended and non-extended

no problem of interaction of substance

some things are space + time, some only time (e.g. hallucinations)

Hegel: now we have dualism of form + content within the perceptual process

experience = a world of which we are conscious

 

what means by dialectic

Antinomies � fundamental to Hegel

 

us(???): to a very great extent, but not exclusively

 

dualism in Fichte (Kantian) + Schelling (anti)

H�rlin � �Kant is our Moses�

 

Questions

Notion/Idea, concepts etc.

febrile time